Organizational Behavior Management Network

What is OBM?
Why Go Into OBM?
Why Use OBM?

Resources
Articles & More
JOBM
Newsletter
Discussion
Links

Membership
Why Join?
Sign-up
Directory

Opportunities
Grants & Awards
Graduate Training
Jobs

More
Upcoming Events
Store / Donations
Contact

About Us
Strategic Plan
Officers
Bylaws

 

 

 



Use of the Performance Diagnostic Checklist to Improve Performance at Two Restaurant Sites

by Byron Wine, Manuel Rodriguez, and David Wilder

Primary Topic
Food Service

Problem Definition
Two franchise restaurants participated in the study. Store 1 had 8 employees and 2 managers. Store 2 had 10 employees and 1 manager. Both restaurants were located in the Southeastern United States.

In both stores, promotional stamps were not being consistently offered to customers.

  • Baseline Store 1: Stamps offered to 26% of customers
  • Baseline Store 2: Stamps offered to 11% of customers

Analysis Tools
Direct Observation was conducted by multiple observers per store during varying times during hours of operation. Once consistent trends were evident by shift per store, the authors utilized the Performance Diagnostic Checklist (PDC) (Austin, 2000) as the method of determining potential areas (Antecedents and Information, Equipment and Processes, Knowledge and Skills Training, and Consequences) of focus that may have produced the observed low levels of performance. By identifying specific areas to target, the author worked with management at each store to organize possible solutions that were identified as being likely to have the most impact on employee performance, and to be most cost-effective.

Root Causes
Store 1: The management and the employees of both stores indicated the antecedent and information category, and the equipment and processes category as being problematic. The employees were not given the proper materials per shift, and during times of high consumer involvement (e.g., lunch hours), employees rarely offered promotional stamps. The management and the employees of both stores also identified that consequences instituted by the organization were delivered inconsistently, and were dependent on specific management on duty. Direct observation also determined that employees contacted specific negative consequences from customers when offering the promotional stamps in the form of rejection, negative statements about other customers misusing stamps, and unfairness of the management of the stamps.

Store 2: The manager and the employee identified a lack of proper antecedents, for example, information was lacking about the use and distribution parameters of the promotional stamps. This lack of information contributed to a confusion about when and how often promotional stamps could be given. Consequences were also identified as being inconsistently delivered, in that the management team often did not reinforce employee's offering of stamps to customers. Finally, the employee and manager also identified that equipment and processes were in need of changing, as the appropriate equipment was not easy to use. Furthermore, when promotional stamps ran out, it took 3-4 working days for additional promotional stamps to arrive at the store.

Solution
Since direct observation and the PDC yielded the described results for the respective locations, an intervention package was developed to be implemented in both locations. Because both stores were operating under the same organization, the management team agreed to have the same intervention package instituted across the two stores. The package, created to address all problem areas identified in the PDC, consisted of:

  • Task Clarification - A memo placed in the employee lounge indicating the purpose of the initiative, and the desired behaviors for offering the promotional stamps were described. The employees were prompted to read the memo once daily by the manager.
  • Self-monitoring - A form was given to the employee that enabled him/her to record the number of times promotional stamps were offered to customers as well as the number of times the promotional stamp was accepted by the customer.
  • Equipment modification - Machines that held the promotional stamps were repaired and tested for ease of use. Additionally, extra supplies of stamps and stamp cards were made available to the employees per week based on baseline data of the number of stamps given per day.
  • Goal setting - A goal was established for the employees to offer stamps 80% of opportunities based on the current trends indicated by management and through the direct observation of the authors.
  • Graphic feedback - Line graphs representing the percent of employees offering the promotion stamps to customers were displayed in the employee lounge.

Results
In store 1 the percentage of customers receiving an offer of stamps increased to 72%, a 46% increase from baseline. The manager of store 1 also described the increase as “promoting more customer focus” behavior. In store 2, the mean of employees offering stamps increased to 81%. These results represent a 70% increase in employee performance from baseline.

References

Austin, J. (2000). Performance analysis and performance diagnostics. In J. Austin & J. E. Carr (Eds.), Handbook of applied behavior analysis (pp. 321-349). Reno, NV: Context Press.

Rodriguez, M., Wilder, D. A., Therrien, K., Wine, B., Miranti, R., ,Daratany, K., Salume, G., Baranovsky, G., & Rodriguez, M. (2005). Use of the Performance Diagnostic Checklist to select an intervention designed to increase the offering of promotional stamps at two sites of a restaurant franchise. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 25(3), 17-35.

Author Bios

Byron Wine is a graduate student at the Florida Institute of Technology in Melbourne, Fl. He can be reached at bwine@fit.edu

Manuel (Manny) Rodriguez is a consultant with the Continuous Learning Group (CLG), a firm dedicated to delivering behaviorally based approaches towards executing strategic initiatives. He can be reached at MRodriguez@clg.com.

David Wilder is an associate professor of psychology at the Florida Institute of Technology in Melbourne, FL. He can be reached at dawilder@fit.edu